Saturday, 13 October 2007

notes on jungian psychological types :: part 1 - The Extraverted/Introverted divide

the parenthisised doohickies at the end of each quote refer to the page numbers in C. G. Jung's Psychological types. The first number refers to the page, the second number refers to the paragraph. As each edition has varying page numbers yr best bet is to refer to paragraphs numbers if you wanna reference the original work.



I shall be embarking on a series of posts concerning Jungian Psychological Types for the purposes of character development in fiction. The notes for which i shall be uploading here for safekeeping and for anyone else to make use of. Afterall, not everybody can just go down their local university library and look through The Collected Works of C. G. Jung for their own personal satisfaction. As I am reading them in the library, and therefore having limited access to them, i will be updating the posts as new information and reflections become available.


The Extraverted/Introverted Type

So, it seems, according to Jung, that your one or t'other, and that the extraverted type relates his entire existence to external objects; be they people, projects, shiny things, whatever. He has no time for the subjective, merely the objective. He lives an 'objective' existence (if such a thing can exist in our post-post-modern times) :

"this is the extraverts danger: he gets sucked into objects and completely loses himself to them." (565/336)

the subjective/introverted world becomes manifest in his unconscious, in a kind of mirror. This is all fine and dandy, as long as the individual in question doesn't 'completely lose himself' to his objects:


"It is an outstanding peculiarity of unconscious impulses that, when deprived of energy by lack of conscious recognition, they take on a destructive character, and this happens as soon as they cease to be compensatory. Their compensatory function ceases as soon as they reach a depth corresponding to a cultural level absolutely incompatible with our own. From this moment the unconcious impulses form a block in every way opposed to the conscious attitude, and its very existence leads to open conflict." ( 574/340 )

( It should be noted that Jung goes on to make further distinctions between types of Extraverted and Introverted types, little sub-groups if you will. I ain't got to that bit yet. In fact, I ain't even finished the Extraverted section. )

What does this mean for the screenwriter if the extraverted reacts to external objects, and the introverted with his own internal subjectivity? Surely, within a film script, protagonists must be of the extraverted type because, according to the screenwriting guru types, Protagonists are defined by action/reaction? (Okay, this may not be the complete truth, but stay with me here).

What if the external objects are in fact manifestations of the protagonists subjectivity? That everything within the diagesis can in fact be mapped, directly or indirectly, back to the protagonists unconscious? What if that's why they came into existence in the first place? If you map your protagonists' conscious/unconscious first, then develop the story and sub-characters second, what kind of film are you writing? How does this effect everything? Does this open you up to new realms of creative expression, or just picking a way to filter that creative expression in the first place?

( i'm thinking outloud here, btw )

towit:

Consider the play of the extraverted/external and Introverted/internal outlook in both Julian and Gethin, with each sliding between the these two extremes throughout the plot, in a kind of counterpoint. A character in a film could be considered extraverted by the very nature of the medium i.e. external factors (preassures cause the actions of the protagonists and sub-characters) but this does not mean that these external forces cannot be, in actuality, manifestations of the internal.

As there are two Protagonists (Julian and Gethin) in this paticular narrative, and neither one supercedes the other, do they in fact become in actuality two sides of the same character? Is this a useful way of looking at them? Also, as they also represent a comedy double-act, is this what the comedy double-act can be viewed as?

FURTHER STUDY: psychological types of comedy double-acts


"A normal extroverted attitude does not, of course, mean that the individual invariably behaves in accordance with the extraverted schema. Even in the same individual many psychological processes may be observed that involve the mechanism of introversion. We call a mode of behavior extraverted only when the mechanism of extraversion predominates. In these caesd the most differentiated functions are in part unconscious and far less under the control of consciousness." [575/340]

"...There is a constant influx of unconscious contents into the conscious psychological process, to such a degree that at times it is hard for the observer to decide which character traits belong to the conscious and which to the unconscious personality." [576/341]

"Introverted thinking then appears as something quite arbitarry [to the extraverted thinker] while extraverted thinking seems dull and banal [to the introverted thinker]. Thus the two orientations are incessantly at war." [581/345]
A good Introduction to Jungian Psychology

Sunday, 2 September 2007

notes from 'Skateboarding, space and the city' (Iain Borden)

"On one level this activity appears as urban escapism... it was a repositioning of the urban... The modernist spa e of surburbia was found, adapted and reconveived as another kind of space, as a concrete wave." (refers to erly surf-style skating) (p.33)

"New hillside housing tracts lost their hideous urban negativity and emerged from the metamorphosis as a smooth uncrowded ribbons of winding joy." (33)


"This recombination of body, image, thought and action lies at the heart of skateboarding - an integration of abstract and concrete, object and performance..."

"the third stage [of skating up a bank that goes vertical] is that stalling space-time where the skater reaches the top of the trajectory, hangs momentarily, and begins the kick-turn - for the skater, this is a highly phsyical yet simultaneously fantastical and dream-like experience, where space-time are confronted and frozen in a dynamic, yet stable instance." (35)

"these aural salvos remind us that 'space is listened for, in fact, as much as seen, and heard before it comes into view," that hearing mediates between the spatial body and the world outside it, and that it is therefore not only in a cathedral or cloister that 'space is measured by ear'. This is 'sensuous geography' created by a phenomonal experience of architecture, a 'sensory space' constituted by an "unconsciously" dramatised interplay of relay points and obstacles, reflections, references, mirrors and echoes." (35)

note: 'sensuous geographies' (Paul Rodaway)

"...'working the surface' involved thinking less about the pool wall as a concrete wave, and more as an element which, together with the skateboard and skater's own body, could be recombined into an excited body-centric space." (36)

Friday, 31 August 2007

[ the thing about cats ]

Cat's can do anything.

Of course they can. They're fucking cats!

"Sure, i can use the phone. Whaddayamean, opposable thumb? fuck that shit, biped."

The cats don't give a fuck.

wEaTeArt claws its zombified corpses up through the mulk and wails victorious into the moonlight.

WeAteaRt is back, in a new form. Now its my research blog. Enjoy the rambling monorail of my mind as it missions forth into brave new dimensions of disciplined and productive thought. Yep.

Monday, 9 April 2007

F.A.G, virgil!

FAGclub is a new queer-orientated non-profit promotion/performance/discussion collective rising out of the ashes of the Cardiff Gay/alternative scene. These idealistic folks are all about putting themselves about in a joyous fashion and regularly hold band nights, events and a whole bunch of other things with their own unique bent. They've even got a record label!

I bumped into one of its members just the other day in the park and, between an intense academic discussion between herself and my friend michael, she told me about the Never Grow Up Weekender coming up on the 20th-22nd of this month (April);

*snip*

"ever felt like peter pan? us too!

we never want to grow up. we will resist their time. be silly. party. dance wildly. sing. bellow. play. create. carnival. make our own definitions of what it means to grow up, or not define ourselves at all....

at fag club we wanted to hold a party that signals both a rejection of and our collective resistance to heteronormative conceptions of time such as progress, maturity, linearity, growing up, getting a mortage and having a family...being queer for us is about rejecting these frameworks for living as we are intent up creating our own forms of play, desire, family, culture and time that is disruptive, unpredictable and creative.

we also offer an intervention into the carnival calender that offers particular times in which we are allowed to publicly celebrate our queerness, eg the weekend in september when it is mardi gras which is becoming an increasingly commercialised spectacle when what we need are genuine forms of community and visibility .

the never grow up party is a d.i.y event, that means that people will be coming together and learning new skills in order to make it happen. it is open to your input and ideas so please get in touch fagclub@riseup.net, we would love to hear from you.

the events will take place over the weekend of april 20-22"


There's no mention of location in their blurb, but I have it on good authority that it'll be in the Model Inn on the 20th, and the howard garden's uwic bar on the 21st (I think). If you want more details your better off emailing them on fagclub@riseup.net.

I'll be there to check it out and shamelessly plug safeasmilk. Maybe I'll see you there.